Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Go Soeda vs Cheong-Eui Kim Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Soeda vs Kim analysis and find out who is favored!
Go Soeda vs Cheong-Eui Kim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Soeda 3 - 1 Kim
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Soeda has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Kim has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Soeda, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kim has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Soeda has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kim has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Soeda has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kim winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Soeda has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 476/ 305), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 19/ 31). Kim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 73/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 8/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Soeda winning 3 times and Kim being victorious 1 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Soeda winning 7 and Kim winning 2. The last match between Soeda and Kim was at the Yokohama Challenger, 26-02-2019, Second, Hard with Go Soeda getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Soeda and Kim have played a deciding set 1 times, with Soeda winning 0 times and Kim 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Soeda winning 1, and Kim 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Soeda has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kim has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Soeda has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kim has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Soeda has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kim has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
683
Rank
47
High
39
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
829
Rank
296
High
34
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
58% (658-471)
Career Total W/L
57% (375-279)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$791,590
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Go Soeda vs Cheong-Eui Kim For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Soeda VS Kim
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Go Soeda | Cheong-Eui Kim |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 7 | 2 |
| Games Won | 50 | 34 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:7:42 | 1:7:42 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (136/231) | 67% (144/215) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (92/136) | 64% (92/144) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (54/95) | 44% (31/71) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (10/30) | 32% (6/19) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (92/215) | 37% (85/231) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Go Soeda
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
46%
(
26 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 6-7(4) 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Go Soeda
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
68%
(
84 of
123)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
53 of
84)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
32%
(
33 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
123)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Go Soeda | Cheong-Eui Kim |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Go Soeda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Go Soeda
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Go Soeda
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Go Soeda
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Go Soeda
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
14
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Go Soeda
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Go Soeda
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Player
Go Soeda
76%
(
90 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
80 of
117)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
120
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(7) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Ulises Blanch
66%
(
77 of
116)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
115)
6
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
43%
(
50 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
115)
121
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
3
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Viktor Durasovic
54%
(
49 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
35 of
42)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 6-7(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Cheong-Eui Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
31%
(
15 of
48)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Galloway
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Duckhee Lee
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Yuta Kawahashi
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Hyeondeok Yoon
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
50%
(
49 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Soeda Vs Kim Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Soeda are available here and Kim photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
